National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2012 Research Presession

Please note: The NCTM conference program is subject to change.

1199-

Tuesday, April 24, 2012: 9:00 AM
Franklin Hall 13 (Philadelphia Marriott Downtown)
Nina P. Arshavsky , University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Chapel Hill, NC


The Impact of Early College High Schools on Mathematics Teaching and Learning

 

Objectives: This paper will examine the impact of the Early College High School (ECHS) model on mathematics teaching and student mathematics performance in the 9th through 11th grade. The specific research questions are:

  1. What is the impact of the early college on students’ coursetaking and academic performance in mathematics in the 9th through 11th grade?
  2. What does mathematics teaching look like in the early college model?  

Theoretical framework:  Early College High Schools are small, innovative high schools that target students who are underrepresented in college, including students who are the first in their family to go to college and students who are low-income or of minority status. Frequently located on college campuses, ECHS serve students in grades 9-12 or through a grade 13 or 5th year. Students are expected to graduate within four to five years with a high school diploma and two years of transferable college credit. As implemented in North Carolina (where this study is being conducted), the schools are expected to implement a specific set of design principles which will be described in the full paper.

Methodology: This paper reports results from an IES-funded longitudinal experimental study of the impact and implementation of North Carolina’s model. Participating schools agreed to use a lottery to select students and the study is tracking outcomes for students randomly accepted into the program (treatment) and those not accepted who enrolled somewhere else (control).

In addition to quantitative data, the study collected qualitative data to describe implementation of the model. As part of site visits to schools, the data on certain instructional features were collected by both observations and interviews with teachers and students.

Sample: In this proposal, we include results from analyses completed to date on a sample of 1,317 9th graders in 15 cohorts in 10 schools; 597 10th graders in seven cohorts of students in five schools; and 252 11th graders in 3 cohorts in two schools. We will have analyses for larger samples completed by the early fall of 2011. An initial analysis of background characteristics of the treatment and control groups found statistically significant differences in the percentage of 9th graders previous retained and in their 8th grade Algebra I pass rates. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups in 10th and 11th grade.

Observations from 20 mathematics classrooms, as well as interviews with math teachers and students from 20 schools will be included in analyses.

Data sources: Students’ academic performance in mathematics are tracked through student-level data collected by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) and housed at the North Carolina Education Research Data Center (NCERDC).

 

Analyses:  For the quantitative analyses, we report the unadjusted means for each group—treatment and control—as well as adjusted impact estimates calculated using regression analyses that incorporate background characteristics and site-level indicators. For each course, we report two outcomes: the percentage of all students in the grade who have taken the course (take-up) and the percentage of all students in the grade who have taken the course and passed the test associated with the course (success).

For the qualitative analyses, we will describe the presence of the following instructional features in mathematics classroom:

  • Engagement in higher order thinking
  • Collaboration with other students and nature of that collaboration
  • Engagement in “elaborated communication” (explaining thinking, writing, presentations, etc.) 
  • Evidence of formative assessment

Results:  Table 2 shows the results for 9th grade mathematics outcomes; Table 3 shows the results for 10th grade mathematics outcomes; and Table 4 shows the results for 11th grade mathematics outcomes. Results show that more 9th and 10th graders in ECHS than in control schools are taking and succeeding in the mathematics courses they need for college.

Table 2: Impact of Early College on Mathematics 9th Grade Outcomes

 

Outcomes

Unadjusted Means

Adjusted Impact

ECHS

(N=739)

Control

(N=578)

Estimate

P-Value

Algebra I

 % Take-up

93.8

80.6

9.7

<0.001

 

 % Success

79.9

69.0

5.5

0.009

College Prep. Math Courses

 %At least one courses take-up

94.8

82.0

9.6

<0.001

 

%  At least two courses take-up

35.0

26.0

8.1

<0.001

 

 % At least one courses success

81.6

70.3

6.1

0.002

 

 % At least two courses success

29.5

25.1

3.6

<0.012

Table 3: Impact of Early College on Mathematics 10th Grade Outcomes

Outcomes

Unadjusted Means

Adjusted Impact

ECHS

(N=399)

Control

(N=277)

Estimate

P-Value

Geometry

 % Take-up

84.6

66.9

12.5

<0.001*

 

 % Success

70.5

58.8

4.9

0.151

Algebra II

% Take-up

53.6

31.5

12.4

<0.001*

 

 % Success

42.8

27.9

9.1

0.005*

College Prep. Math Courses

 %At least two courses take-up

92.8

67.6

17.7

<0.001*

 

%  At least three courses take-up

45.3

30.8

7.2

0.017*

 

 % At least two courses success

72.8

57.1

6.0

0.075

 

 % At least three courses success

36.3

27.9

4.1

0.2

 

The data from 11th grade show a more inconsistent impact on academic outcomes with positive results primarily for coursetaking and a possibly negative impact on success in math courses, which may be due to a smaller sample. The additional analyses will include larger sample of 11th graders.

Table 4: Impact of Early College on Mathematics 11th Grade Outcomes

Outcomes

Unadjusted Means

Adjusted Impact

ECHS

(N=124)

Control

(N=128)

Estimate

P-Value

Algebra II

 % Take-up

86.3

65.6

17.7

<0.001*

 

 % Success

50.0

58.6

-9.2

0.087

College Prep. Math Courses

 %At least two courses take-up

92.7

72.7

17.3

<0.001*

 

%  At least three courses take-up

84.7

64.8

17.0

<0.001*

 

 % At least two courses success

62.9

60.2

2.3

0.652

 

 % At least three courses success

46.8

52.3

-5.1

0.33

 

The preliminary analyses of student focus groups and classroom observations show that early college students spend a large portion of their time in mathematics classroom working on projects both collaboratively and individually. Students report that they collaborate with each other at a higher rate than in the regular school, they are engaged in rigorous thinking and extensive communication, and that they experience personalized support from their teachers that is based on teachers’ constant monitoring of students’ progress. The presentation will expand on these qualitative data.

Significance: This rigorous experimental study of the Early College High School model shows that the model is having a statistically significant and substantively important impact on student coursetaking and learning in mathematics. More 9th and 10th graders are taking and succeeding in math college preparatory courses, although the impact is not as clear in 11th grade. The connections between teaching and learning are discussed.

<< Previous Presentation | Next Presentation